Romance novels - love them or hate them?

April 9, 2012 

My colleague, Sonya Sorich, recently wrote about her journey into "Fifty Shades of Grey," an erotic novel that's made it to #1 on the New York Times bestseller list.

Romance novels and erotica -- particularly those mass market paperbacks you find at the drugstore -- tend to get a bad rap. People point to their contrived plots, bad writing and the cheesy-looking covers.

But not all romance and erotica is bad. Here's what's in a good romance or erotic novel, according to a reader quote on Vulture.com:

“A hero who’s neither twisted and sadistic nor overly perfect. A heroine who’s not too stupid. No smuggling or kidnapping subplots. No gratuitous S&M or tantric sex. And no anachronistic names—women were not named Brittany in Regency London.”

In other words, a story and characters that are somewhat believable -- even in a paranormal ghost romance (yes, this exists).

I haven't read "Fifty Shades." I read through the first couple pages on Amazon.com and decided it wasn't really my thing. According to this helpful romance/erotica flowchart, I lean more toward Regency romances. No surprise really, considering my penchant for Downton Abbey.

Ledger-Enquirer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service