Georgia’s defenders tackling their issues

semerson@macon.comSeptember 4, 2013 

Georgia Clemson NCAA Football

Clemson's Sammy Watkins, left, outruns Georgia safety Conor Norman as he scores on a 77-yard touchdown reception in the first quarter of their NCAA college football game Saturday, Aug. 31, 2013 in Clemson, S.C.(AP Photo/Anderson Independent-Mail, Mark Crammer)

MARK CRAMMER — AP

ATHENS -- Damian Swann said he hadn’t heard what was said on the television broadcast, but he remembered the play. Oh, did he remember it.

During the first quarter of Saturday’s game, Swann had a straight shot at trying to tackle Clemson receiver Sammy Watkins. But the Georgia cornerback went low, Watkins bounced off him and then went on for a 77-yard touchdown, leading ABC analyst Kirk Herbstreit to decry Swann for “awful tackling.”

Swann said he wasn’t bothered to hear the criticism, saying, “That’s what they’re paid to do,” and he and owned up to his mistake.

“I thought I could hit him and he’ll go down. I didn’t wrap up. That was my mistake,” he said. “But at the end of the game that wasn’t the play that lost the game.”

That’s true, as Georgia soon rallied to take a 21-14 lead. But missed tackles in general were an issue for Georgia, and that issue needs to be firmed up if Georgia hopes to knock off No. 6 South Carolina on Saturday.

To that end, the Bulldogs have been emphasizing physical practices all week. In an unusual move, head coach Mark Richt held a full-pads practice Wednesday.

“We need to tackle better than we did, especially in space,” Richt said.

There were plenty of examples.

On Clemson’s first drive of the second half, freshman safety Tray Matthews couldn’t wrap up on fourth down, on a stop that would have given the Georgia offense the ball at its own 37. Instead Clemson got the first down and on the next play got the go-ahead score on a long touchdown pass.

Early in the fourth quarter, with Clemson leading 31-28, defensive end Toby Johnson had a clear shot at Tajh Boyd but couldn’t bring him down for a sack. One play later the Tigers had a first down into Georgia territory.

Some players traced the problems to the preseason, when numerous players -- especially in the secondary -- either missed practices or went non-contact because of injuries. Matthews was among them.

But it doesn’t explain all of them. Swann was healthy pretty much all of preseason and started every game last year.

Johnson’s missed sack may have just been inexperience. The junior college transfer reached the backfield in one of his first plays and admitted he was “super surprised” to suddenly be on top of Boyd.

“It came too open,” Johnson said.

Defensive coordinator Todd Grantham did appear to think the missed practices were a culprit, not so much the lack of physical contact but the correct timing and taking the right angle on the ballcarrier.

“We had a chance to stop them in the fourth quarter, and we had a couple missed tackles, which were more angles to the ball than necessarily the technique of tackling the guy,” Grantham said. “If we’d have done a little better job there ,we would have given the offense a chance to win the game. So you’ve gotta work on it.”

This isn’t to say the defense’s problem was just tackling. Other times the players were just in the wrong spot.

Outside linebacker Jordan Jenkins pointed to one of Boyd’s touchdown runs. Three Georgia linemen lined up to one side of the ball, leaving Jenkins practically alone on the other side. Boyd went right through the hole.

“A couple times we just never gave ourselves a chance to win,” Jenkins said. “It’s really small fixes like that; that will give us a chance to fight off of that and possibly stop it if everybody was lined up right.”

Those instances will get a look this week, too. But physical play will get even more emphasis.

“I mean tackling is one of the things you learn when you start playing the game,” Swann said. “So missing a couple days of practice, I don’t think that was it. It was just being able to make the play. We didn’t make them, and it kind of hurt us.”

Ledger-Enquirer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service