Columbus Ledger-Enquirer Logo

Froma Harrop: 'Soft' sexism can be ambiguity trap | Columbus Ledger-Enquirer

×
  • E-edition
  • Home
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Archives
    • Buy Photos and Pages
    • Special Sections
    • Contact Us
    • Plus
    • Newsletters
    • Newspaper in Education
    • Subscribe
    • Subscriber Services

    • News
    • Local News
    • Photos
    • Crime
    • Databases
    • Education
    • Job Spotlight
    • Georgia
    • Business
    • Nation/World
    • Lottery
    • Sports
    • Alabama
    • Auburn
    • Braves
    • Columbus State University
    • Cottonmouths
    • Falcons
    • Hawks
    • High Schools
    • UGA
    • Blogs & Columns
    • War Eagle Extra
    • Bulldogs Blog
    • Valley Preps
    • Guerry Clegg
    • Politics
    • Elections
    • ToDo
    • Living
    • Dining
    • Celebrations
    • Outdoors
    • Faith
    • Comics
    • Puzzles & Games
    • Horoscopes
    • Blogs & Columns
    • War Eagle Extra
    • Bulldogs Blog
    • Guerry Clegg
    • Tim Chitwood
    • Richard Hyatt
    • Ledger Inquirer
    • Valley Preps
    • Chuck Williams
    • Dimon Kendrick-Holmes
    • Alva James-Johnson
    • Natalia Naman Temesgen
    • Chris Johnson
    • Opinion
    • Forum
    • Letters
    • Dusty Nix
    • Sound Off
  • Obituaries
  • Readers' Choice

  • Classifieds
  • Jobs
  • Moonlighting
  • Cars
  • Homes
  • Place An Ad

  • About Us
  • Mobile & Apps

Opinion Forum

Froma Harrop: 'Soft' sexism can be ambiguity trap

    ORDER REPRINT →

April 05, 2015 12:00 AM

Ellen Pao's gender discrimination suit against her employer contained the juicy elements that captivate us. The plaintiff was a Harvard-educated lawyer suing for a healthy $16 million. The defendant was Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, the high-powered venture capital firm. The locale was Silicon Valley, where many complain that the big fortunes go overwhelmingly to men. And Pao's evidence resided largely in gray areas, where things said and things done could be interpreted in several ways.

The case pitted the very privileged against the mega-privileged. That may explain why the jury rejected Pao's claims of gross unfairness. The jury members were mostly ordinary working folks, who probably put up with a lot more indignity for a lot less money.

But the gray areas mattered most of all. When the questions under consideration come down to "he said, she interpreted," it's hard to pin down sexual discrimination. That doesn't mean it didn't exist. But the wiser course may be to laugh at, work around or ignore these slights rather than drag the men into court.

As many women have learned, the guys asked to join the top are the guys other guys have bonded with. Superior credentials go just so far. In collaborative businesses, people yak all the time -- in offices, at lunch, in bars, at sporting events. They converse in the wee hours and in various states of fatigue and intoxication.

SIGN UP

Sign Up and Save

Get six months of free digital access to the Ledger-Enquirer

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

#ReadLocal

Stray remarks that could get a man spanked at college for being sexist may flow more freely in these environs. They may be the product of genuine affection, lousy language skills or misplaced gallantry. Or they may be inappropriate beyond a reasonable doubt.

But outside of bald crudeness and sex-for-promotion offers, such interactions can be handled with humor, diplomacy and forgiveness of human frailty. Fear of the vigilant feminist poised to call the lawyers may cause men to keep female colleagues at an unhelpful social distance.

Looking over Pao's arguments, one might find grounds for complaint. For example, on Valentine's Day, a male colleague gave her Leonard Cohen's "Book of Longing." While the date of the gift and the romantic content might not earn an A in gender consciousness-raising class, it is a book of Zen-inspired poems, after all.

Same guy invited Pao to dinner when his wife was away. A female associate might use it as an opportunity to engage in bonding banter. If his intentions were dishonorable, a professional woman should know how to handle the situation.

Or the man may have simply wanted company at a meal with a co-worker he liked. Should Pao have been happier had he invited a male junior partner instead?

A group of Kleiner Perkins men went on a skiing trip but didn't invite any women. That is really too bad. On the other hand, the guys drinking grappa around the fire after dinner might not have felt free to let loose in the company of sensitive women. A reference to porn stars on a private jet was one of Pao's raps against the company.

We are not so naive to believe that Silicon Valley companies are pure meritocracies, the tech industry's propaganda to the contrary. Where there is big money, men flock for the badges of male power. Sexual tension is a biological reality. And there's the comfort factor: Like wants to be with like.

So soft discrimination certainly exists. Sophisticated people should deal with it in a sophisticated manner -- with subtlety. Rather than make men more sympathetic to the ambitions of their female colleagues, the threat of suits like this one could make men more scared of collaborating with them.

Froma Harrop, Creators Syndicate, 5777 W. Century Blvd., Suite 700, Los Angeles, CA, 90045.

  Comments  

Videos

Springer Opera House production of “Evita” moving to CSU’s Riverside Theatre Complex

Springer to Community: “The Show Must Go On”

View More Video

Trending Stories

Phenix City woman gunned down in driveway on Fourth Place South, coroner says

February 23, 2019 12:43 PM

Body of Columbus woman found in creek off Lee Road 454 , coroner says

February 23, 2019 11:01 AM

Only 20 students qualified for the 2019 Georgia Spelling Bee. One is from Columbus.

February 23, 2019 05:06 PM

These 5 Columbus area teams still have a chance to win a 2019 state basketball title

February 22, 2019 05:02 PM

Columbus artists shares his street photography at Black Art in America gallery

February 22, 2019 08:00 AM

Read Next

Prison reform marks yet another win for President Trump

Opinion Forum

Prison reform marks yet another win for President Trump

By Alveda King

    ORDER REPRINT →

December 19, 2018 12:00 AM

In an unexpected twist, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has decided to put the FIRST STEP Act to a vote. President Donald Trump has made upholding promises a cornerstone of his presidency, and his successful advocacy of the act shows that he won’t shy away from holding Congress to the same standard.

KEEP READING

Sign Up and Save

#ReadLocal

Get six months of free digital access to the Ledger-Enquirer

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

MORE OPINION FORUM

Transit now a statewide focus in Georgia

Opinion Forum

Transit now a statewide focus in Georgia

December 02, 2018 12:00 AM

Opinion Forum

The rhetoric of ‘outside agitators’ has a troubling past we can’t ignore

December 02, 2018 12:00 AM

Opinion

Should you vote for Marsy’s Law on the Georgia ballot?

October 28, 2018 12:00 AM
Fort Benning’s long-lasting relationship with the Columbus area will continue to flourish

Opinion Forum

Fort Benning’s long-lasting relationship with the Columbus area will continue to flourish

October 28, 2018 12:00 AM

Opinion

Pipe Bomb terrorism shows why we need to come together as a country

October 27, 2018 12:00 AM
Me Too for some; others not invited

Opinion

Me Too for some; others not invited

October 09, 2018 11:39 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

Columbus Ledger-Enquirer App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Start a Subscription
  • Customer Service
  • eEdition
  • Vacation Hold
  • Pay Your Bill
  • Rewards
Learn More
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletters
  • News in Education
Advertising
  • Digital Solutions
  • Niche Solutions
  • Print Solutions
  • Place a Classified
  • Local Deals
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story